Uncertain Traveler

walkingThe Torah is a code which assumes a community tradition to fill in its gaps. That is, the Torah does not spell out how to carry out many of its commands. The details of procedure are often left to the people. And the intention of Torah is clearly not to arrive at a situation like that in the book of Judges, where “every man did what was right in his own eyes.”

In matters of legal judgment, the Torah’s gaps were to be filled in by judges and by a sort of high court (Deut 17:8-13) and the people are not to turn to the right or to the left from the rulings of Israel’s judges. In matters of worship procedure and liturgy, the Levitical priests are the ones who determine the practice of the community.

-Derek Leman
“Torah Fundamental #2”
Messianic Jewish Musings

The Toras HaNefesh learns an important message about when to temper one’s avodah from a statement on today’s daf. “When a person ascends in understanding, he should also develop greater empathy for the pain of others. This is even true regarding fulfilling a mitzvah. If one is overzealous in fulfilling mitzvos, he can sometimes insult another Jew undeservedly. Usually this kind of person has forgotten his friend’s feelings and doesn’t even realize that he has sinned. He might have insulted another Jew, or he might have treated his fellow with less than the honor that he deserves, or he might have forgotten to consider the ramifications of his actions on his friend’s livelihood.

Daf Yomi Digest
Stories Off the Daf
“Send Her Away – No Matter What”
Chullin 141

For yesterday’s morning meditation, I wrote something that is a reversal from my usual theme and asked if a Christian should limit his or her Jewish learning. I know I typically advocate for Christians pursuing the traditional Jewish texts in order to discover the “Jewishness of Jesus”, but obviously this has pitfalls. For one thing, it may not be easy or even possible to really deconstruct Mishnah, Talmud, and Gemara back to that very special first century Rabbi in order to learn what he was teaching within its intended context. I must admit that much of the material I study seems to resemble what Jesus has taught to his disciples, but I know I have probably been deceiving myself. I hope I wasn’t deceiving you.

Wait. Let me explain.

I’m not “throwing the baby out with the bathwater” and I still think there is value in a Christian studying Judaism. I’m still here and I’m still studying, so it’s still important to me. But maybe I’ve been generalizing information beyond reasonable bounds. I quoted that small piece from from the “story off the daf” to illustrate that this information was written by and for Jews. Sure, some of what is presented in Jewish literature can be applied to a larger, non-Jewish audience but a lot of it can’t. Here’s another example:

In any case, since virtually all Jews with an interest in proper practice – lay preachers, priests, pietists, scribes – will have appealed to the Torah for support, the scriptural origins of mishnaic law will tell us nothing about the social group or groups from which the Mishnah derives. Nor can such derivation tell us whether a given law is a pre-mishnaic tradition or a mishnaic creation, since Jews read Scripture both before and after 70 C.E. If a mishnaic law can be shown to derive from a specific mode of reading Scripture, and if that mode of reading can be shown to derive from a specific group or a specific period, then of course the origins of that law would be established. But, as far as I know, convincing examples of this have yet to be adduced.

-Shaye J.D. Cohen
“The Judaean Legal Tradition and the Halakhah of the Mishnah”
Published in The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature
Edited by Charlotte E. Fonrobert and Martin S. Jaffee

Also, as Derek Leman says on the blog post I previously quoted:

The problem with Torah Fundamental #2 is that modern readers of the Bible tend to prefer the “every man does what is right in his own mind” ethic of our time. Tradition is a bad word. Authority in the hands of a group of people, such as the rabbis, is deemed oppressive and false. The Bible means what it means to me and no one should dictate procedure or tradition. How does Israel’s tradition work and how can those who want to know Torah respect the tradition?

Here is a problem that occurs often in our time: a person discovers Torah coming from a free church tradition and becomes “Hebraic” or “Messianic” and they read Torah as a free thinker descended from the Enlightenment. The people who fall into this trap generally don’t realize that they are reading Torah in a modernist mode. They think they are being true to the Bible.

Even if we look at the same texts as Jewish people, we don’t always see the same things. In fact, to the degree that Gentile Christians lack a Jewish conceptual framework, we are guaranteed not to see the same things. When a Jewish teacher tries to explain this to us, we are likely to reject his comments out of hand, because they go against how our Gentile perceptions construct God, Jesus, and the Bible. I try very hard to avoid falling into this trap and in my own limited way, I think I am successful. But not entirely.

at-the-edgeI struggle with how far I can take my present course and whether or not I’ll go sailing off the edge of the world and into the infinite abyss (I’m being overly dramatic) in my zeal, but the other option is to censor myself and limit what I read and study. I don’t like that idea, either. What I require ideally is the context I lack because I was not born Jewish, not raised in a Jewish home, and not educated as a Jew. No, I don’t regret who I am, how I was raised, and what I have learned in my life as it has been, but my “identity” automatically restricts my abilities and perceptions in terms of studying Judaism.

Some Christians have overcome this barrier, but only after many years of study, usually in a Jewish context such as classes offered at a synagogue, Jewish Community Center, or similar environment. For reasons too lengthy to explain, those options are not currently available to me. Still, I cannot simply let this go. I just have to try to be more careful.

Of course, I’m still going to make mistakes, I just hate making them.

I found something interesting at Chabad.org yesterday.

Wisdom lives in the future, and from there it speaks to us. There is no such thing as wisdom of the past.

Wisdom preceded the world and wisdom is its destiny. With each passing moment, wisdom becomes younger, as we come closer to the time when it is born and breathes the air of day.

Our ancient mothers and fathers, the sages, all those from whom we learn wisdom—they are not guardians of the past. They are messengers of the future.

The truth can never be old-fashioned. It was never in fashion to begin with.

-Rabbi Tzvi Freeman
“Youthful Wisdom”
Based on letters and talks of the Rebbe
Rabbi M. M. Schneerson

I’m used to thinking of wisdom as being locked up in the works of the past and the minds and hearts of people long gone from this world. When I think of “wisdom” as a goal, it never occurred to me to consider wisdom as something we are longing for in the same way we are longing for the Messiah. I know that the path toward wisdom, like living a life, cannot be experienced without making mistakes. Making a mistake is sometimes more helpful in learning something revolutionary than making 1,000 correct decisions. It’s also more painful.

no-danger-of-fallingThe conclusion I’m approaching is that limiting my access to Jewish educational materials isn’t going to help me, but attempting not to stretch them too far outside of their original form and substance might. That still goes against my nature, because stretching or bending information and concepts more often leads to revolutionary or evolutionary learning than playing it safe.

As you can see, I’m still arguing with myself about what I should do and where I should go from here. I just gave a piece of advice to another Christian blogger not to make a change just to reduce anxiety or just for the sake of changing something. In that same vein, I don’t think I’ll change to much around here in the near future. I’ll try to be more careful in how I apply what I’m learning, but to tell you the truth, I learn more when someone comes in here and explains what I said wrong and why it was wrong, than when people come around and say that I got it right (not that I mind complements).

I don’t think I’m really in danger of falling off the edge of the world (and based on the lack of comments in that blog post to date, other people don’t think so, either). However, I do need to verify that my footing is a little more sure sometimes. Perhaps someday, wisdom will lend me her wings so I can fly across the edge and discover the other side.

Why do I do this? Why am I on this rather problematic path? I feel driven by something I can’t explain and I feel that it’s important to try to understand certain things. I believe this trail, for me, is the right one, even though I walk it very imperfectly. I stumble, stagger, and fall like a drunken student on the floor of my school house that keeps tilting and twisting under me. But I’m waiting for something. I’m waiting for someone. Is wisdom coming from the future, tracing a backward path toward humanity like the coming of Messiah?

The great song traveler passed through here
And he opened my eyes to the view
And I was among those who called him a prophet
And I asked him what was true
Until the distance had shown how the road remains alone
Now I’m looking in my life for a truth that is my own

Well I looked into the sky for my anthem
And the words and the music came through
But words and music will never touch the beauty that I’ve seen
Looking into you

And that’s true

-Jackson Browne
“Looking Into You” (1972)

9 thoughts on “Uncertain Traveler”

  1. That makes the sages of the past prophets and not teachers, summoning the future rather than teaching us tradition. Wisdom becomes something to look forward to, not what has already happened. We can wake up each morning and expect something new.

  2. This looks like something of a watershed moment for you.

    I guess it’s best, when learning about Talmud or other Jewish literature, not to trust that first instinct of, “oh my goodness, this is just like something Jesus taught!” These claims must be put under scrutiny, because different religious traditions can appear more similar than they really are to people that aren’t really familiar with the core structures. But on some things, like Rabban Hillel’s weaker version of Jesus’ famous “Golden Rule,” we can be certain of mutual dependence on a tradition that stretches back well before the Tannaitic era and is extant in the Talmud. Yeshua certainly favored Rabban Hillel to Shammai. Even his strict denunciation of divorce was really based on idealism.

    However, even if we count Yeshua with the Sages, his model of discipleship was always prophetic, not scholarly; even though he often drew on the common tradition, he never said, “I heard this from Rabbi so-and-so, who heard it from his Rabbi”, probably because his vocation was not tied to any one teacher (maybe he was entirely self-taught), and because he knew that his authority came directly from Heaven. At what point he realized the latter, well, that’s a bottomless debate, isn’t it? 🙂

  3. It’s difficult because there’s a great temptation to want to link the “Jewish Jesus” to the larger world of Jewish religious teachings, but as you say, it’s very easy to fool ourselves by seeing superficial similarities and drawing premature conclusions. I think the comparison between Jesus and Hillel also requires some care. On the surface, they seem to agree on particular issues, but as I recall (but not clearly), there is at least one occasion where Jesus supported a teaching of Shammai.

    I don’t doubt that Jesus had to have been aware of the sages of his age and before, if for no other reason than because he would have been exposed to those teachings while growing up. Also, as you say, at some point, he became aware of his authority from Heaven and then, the knowledge of the Father became available to him.

    In reading The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature (and I’ve realized this before to one degree or another), it is becoming abundantly clear that we know very little about Jewish thought, wisdom, and religious practice in the late Second Temple period. Everyone and his pet snake Reggie has an idea or a theory based on this bit of evidence or that, but no one really knows. This is also true for what Christian scholars know of that period and the development of early Christianity.

    If you look at how the Bible is interpreted in Christian circles and compare that with what I just said, we have to be fairly arrogant, ignorant, or both to be able to come to some of the conclusions we proudly announce in the blogosphere. It’s one thing to explore the possibilities or even to use our projections as metaphors for the circumstances of our daily lives, but it is very different to say something like, “When Jesus said this, he really meant that” as if that were a fact and the only possible interpretation of his teaching.

  4. “On the surface, they seem to agree on particular issues, but as I recall (but not clearly), there is at least one occasion where Jesus supported a teaching of Shammai.”

    That would be divorce, as I mentioned in the last post. But even that strict teaching was based on idealism (even naivety, by my lights) about the God-sanctioned value of the marriage partnership, not the more traditional value of familial continuity (which Jesus certainly wasn’t the biggest proponent of). Elsewhere, he forgave an adulterous woman and saved her life.

  5. “I don’t doubt that Jesus had to have been aware of the sages of his age and before, if for no other reason than because he would have been exposed to those teachings while growing up.”

    Whatever we know about Jesus is only what the authors of the gospels chose to put down (assuming they themselves were direct witnesses and not collectors of information from others, like the author of Luke gospel clearly was).

  6. Whatever we know about Jesus is only what the authors of the gospels chose to put down (assuming they themselves were direct witnesses and not collectors of information from others, like the author of Luke gospel clearly was).

    Gene, could you expand on that just a bit? As you know, particularly lately, I’ve been struggling to dig a bit into the “Jewish Jesus” and probably not doing a very good job of it. What do you believe we can reasonably know about him, assuming we step outside the view of the traditional church?

  7. “That makes the sages of the past prophets and not teachers, summoning the future rather than teaching us tradition. Wisdom becomes something to look forward to, not what has already happened. We can wake up each morning and expect something new.”

    Right, James….Go to Jerusalem and see the future…They are turning it to Iran, with ayatolas rule….

Leave a reply to James Cancel reply