I consider myself a Christian in the sense that I am a disciple of Jesus Christ but more specifically, I am a student of Messianic Judaism because I believe that discipline represents a perspective on the Bible, the Good News of Messiah, the New Covenant, and Israel that is scripturally sound and that describes the Bible as the single, unified expression of God’s desires, intent, and plan, first for Israel, and then, by Israel’s light, for the rest of the world.
And yet, to do that, I have learned to accept a few things that other people, that is, Christians, don’t like. I accept that the New Covenant was made exclusively with the House of Israel and the House of Judah (Jeremiah 31:31) and not with humanity in general. Further, I accept that when God, through the prophet, says “the House of Israel and the House of Judah,” He is referring specifically to the physical descendents of the Israelites who stood before God at Mt Sinai and accepted the covenant relationship between God and Israel (Exodus 20) in perpetuity (Jeremiah 31:35-36), who are today the Jewish people, and that the eternal inheritance of the Jews is the nation of Israel, which we have with us now.
I accept that the Gentiles are to be attracted to Israel as a light (Deuteronomy 4:5-8, Isaiah 49:6) with the strongest light being King Messiah, Son of David (John 8:12) as God’s emissary, agent, and deliverer of the promises God has made, causing the New Covenant age to be inaugurated with his death and resurrection, that the Jews might believe God will deliver on His promises to them, and that the Gentiles might be grafted into the blessings of those promises, taking the fringes of a Jewish man and going with him, for God is with him (Zechariah 8:23).
I’ve heard it said that the Jewish man in question is not just any Jewish person, but specifically is Messiah. That we from the nations approach God and His holiness by attaching ourselves to Israel through Messiah and going up with him to Jerusalem, to the House of Prayer for all the peoples (Isaiah 56:7).
So what’s wrong with all of that? Apparently, plenty.
From a Christian’s point of view, which includes some in the Hebrew Roots movement who say they disdain the Church, God made a covenant with Israel at Sinai that had effect and potency until the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Then everything changed. The Jewish people no longer were automatically included in the Sinai covenant (although the Abrahamic covenant remained in force) and in order to re-enter a covenant relationship with God, they had to enter into the New Covenant, represented by a brand new entity wholly divorced from Judaism called “the Church”.
From Christianity’s point of view, this means Jewish people remain Jewish but must surrender Judaism and convert to Christianity, along with the Gentiles, and live, for all intents and purposes, a Gentile Christian lifestyle free of “the Law” and solely under grace (as if the two are mutually exclusive). There must be absolutely no distinction between Jew and Gentile in the Church.
From a Hebrew Roots perspective, this means Jewish people remain Jewish and continue practicing Judaism, but the “one new man” entity they must join requires that all Gentile disciples are totally and completely the same as their Jewish counterparts, and must observe the identical set of Torah commandments as the Jew. There must be absolutely no distinction between Jew and Gentile in Hebrew Roots congregations, many of which inaccurately call themselves “Messianic Judaism.”
But the Messianic Judaism I study and adhere to has a different perspective, one that recognizes a specific distinctiveness between Jews and Gentiles within the ekklesia of Messiah, such that each group in the body serves different, although sometimes overlapping functions.
I accept, for instance, that it would be inappropriate for me to claim an obligation to don tzitzit and lay tefillin when praying, to keep kosher in the manner of the Jews, to observe, in the present age, a Shabbat, and to say that it would be a sin if I did not perform any of those mitzvot.
That isn’t to say, especially being married to a Jewish wife, that I’m forbidden to keep kosher or observe the Shabbat (though at present, I only keep “kosher-style” and both my wife and I have elected to work on the Shabbat — may the day come when our observance is more faithful). I even know Gentile Messianics who choose to don tzitzit and lay tefillin privately in prayer, but who do not declare that they are obligated to do so.
I also accept that the New Covenant was made only with the Jewish people and that my only access is through faith in Messiah, not because of any inherit worth I have ethnically or nationally as a non-Jew.
My understanding of the Jewish covenant relationship with God is that it extends continually from Exodus 20 forward in time and into the modern age. While Jesus inaugurated the New Covenant with his death and resurrection, getting the ball rolling, so to speak, it won’t reach any sort of fruition until his second coming, when he destroys all of Israel’s enemies, making the Gentile survivors vassal nations under Israel’s sovereignty, and establishing a unprecedented world-wide reign of peace. Then the Jewish people will be restored to their Land, to Israel, and the Gentiles who are called by His Name will come alongside Israel and serve her King, for he is our King, and worship God on the Temple Mount.
No new body is created in Acts 2, it’s an extension of the all of the previous covenants God made with Israel including the New Covenant, and the precursor to the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises to Israel and to the nations. A subset of all the Jewish people in existing in the first century accepted the Good News of Messiah, and they represent an unbroken stream that goes all the way back to the Exodus and even to Abraham. And the Jewish people who did not accept the Good News remain under the Sinai covenant and in God’s love and compassion, and as God declares in the New Covenant:
“I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the Lord, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.”
One day, God will forgive Israel’s sins, and the Jewish people will make teshuvah and return.
“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling. Behold, your house is being left to you desolate! For I say to you, from now on you will not see Me until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’”
Israel will one day say “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord” and on that day, the Gentiles will join with Israel at feast of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Matthew 8:11).
Does that make me and all the non-Jewish disciples of Messiah who study Messianic Judaism into second-class citizens in the Kingdom of God? To be honest, there are days when I think so. I suppose it’s my innate attraction to Jewish worship and scholarship that periodically has me longing to be able to join a minyan or to be called to the bema for an aliyah (not that I speak or read Hebrew). I sometimes see Jews in Messianic synagogues worshiping and praying the prayers and wish I could be a part of them. Sometimes I feel I should leave any sort of affiliation to Messianic Judaism behind and just keep my peace silently, communing only with God, because I feel I can never truly be part of Jewish people in Jewish community.
But I don’t fit in at church either, so that cannot be my sole connection to fellowship. Also, I must admit that any issues I may have feeling any disconnection with Messianic Judaism are my personal issues and hardly the fault of Jewish needs or requirements in community, since after all, the “chosenness” of Israel is a decision of God, not of man, and I must obey God before the will of any human being, even (especially) my own will (Acts 5:29).
That is why I call myself a “Messianic Gentile” and choose to study within a Messianic Jewish framework. That is why it is OK, even if I am a “second-class citizen” (which I’m actually not), because my citizenship is in the Kingdom of God, among the ekklesia, both ancient and modern, in the tradition of every Gentile who has ever come alongside Israel because we have heard God is with them, from the days of Moses to the days of the apostle Paul.
And Korach, the son of Yitzhor, the son of K’hos, the son of Levi, took …
Rashi explains that the key reason for Korach’s rebellion against Moshe was that he was envious of another relative who received honor while he didn’t.
-Rabbi Zelig Pliskin
Commentary on Torah Portion Korach, pg 332
Growth Through Torah
If I were to allow envy of the obligations and privileges of the Jewish people in the Messianic community to affect me, I would be as Rashi characterized Korach and his band: rebellious. May it never be.
Rabbi Pliskin’s Torah commentaries speak more to me about my own state as a Gentile studying and learning within a Jewish context, being attached to but not the same as the Jewish co-participants in the body of Messiah. In Part Two of this series, I’ll discuss more of my perspective using R. Pliskin’s missives as a foundation.
For more on the Korach rebellion, which was last week’s Torah portion, read “The Importance of Unity” at ProjectGenesis.org.
24 thoughts on “Why I am A Messianic Gentile, Part One”
I love the phrase, “Oneness is not sameness.” This resonates within the Christian church as well. The understanding within a traditional Christian church is that all are members but some are called for preaching and teaching. Oneness in membership, but not sameness in position or calling. We are all one body but different parts.
Unfortunately the traditional Christian church stops short and only carries this ideology with its boundaries. I find myself identifying with this post that I am part of God’s kingdom along with His chosen, Jewish people. However I am not the same. I do not have the same role. I find it empowering to know that I have a role, but I do not have to force myself into a role that isn’t meant for me. I feel more at home.
Great post, James.
“From a Christian’s point of view, […], God made a covenant with Israel at Sinai that had effect and potency until the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Then everything changed. The Jewish people no longer were automatically included in the Sinai covenant…”
R. Kendall Soulen calles this particular Christian teaching “economic supersessionism”, which holds that God:
“…designed carnal Israel from the very beginning to become obsolete with the coming of Christ. In the standard model, it operates by insisting that everything characteristic of Israel’s life under the “Old Covenant” is fulfilled and rendered obsolete by its ecclesial equivalent: the written Mosaic law by Christ’s spiritual law, circumcision by baptism, natural descent by faith, and so on.”
Since the Church already has an errant concept of who they/we are within God’s plan of redemption–within our own religious structure–there’s no possible way that they/we will be able to perceive our identity and role when exposed to a Jewish environment of worship.
I was thinking along the same lines reading last weeks portion as I wondered, and hoped, that perhaps some of those inflamed with jealousy would see it too, and repent.
Looking forward to the next installment.
@Ruth: I had this discussion with a friend over coffee yesterday. We agreed that when Messiah returns and raises Israel as the head of all the nations and Israel is the center of the Kingdom rather than “the Church,” many Christians will reject him and call him the “anti-Christ.”
I don’t know why that idea has never occurred to me, but I can clearly see how that could happen. Wow, that is a breath taking idea to comprehend.
The idea never occurred to you or most other believers because it’s never taught in church. In fact, it is a radically different way of re-imaging how the return of Messiah will develop and the ultimate result of establishing the Kingdom of God on earth. Christianity as a whole believes “the Church” is the central entity in God’s plan, even though the Bible clearly states that Israel has centrality. That’s why so many churches preach that the Church is “spiritual Israel” in order to replace Israel in the New Covenant promises. However, taken at face value, while the people of the nations still enjoy vast benefits and blessings from the New Covenant, we only so so by being grafted into the ekklesia of Messiah by faith and grace.
Not that you were intending to “lump me in” with “the church,” but I definitely do not think the same way. I am fairly new on my Messianic Gentile/Jewish journey. After 30 years of traditional Christianity, it’s been less than a year realizing that ideology is wrong.
In the last year, I’ve often wondered how “the church” will react when the Messiah returns. I’ve just made the assumption that the majority have a love for him, even though misled at the moment, and they will “auto correct” quickly. The idea just had not occurred to me that he would be considered an anti-Christ to those that are stuck in the replacement theology vortex.
Sorry to “lump you in.” It was unintentional.
A cosmic “auto-correct” would be nice, but I don’t think that’s how God works. Yes, He will write the Torah on everyone’s heart so we will know God and not sin against Him, but I think we have to we accepting of Messiah and willing participants of the plan. I think when Messiah comes, we’ll be responsible for recognizing him, which is why he told us what to look for and how not to be fooled. (Matthew 24:23-26 for example).
Well James, you know I don’t agree with you on much of what you teach. If you only want comments that agree with you, just delete this one.
Yeshua said his sheep know his voice, know him, are known of him. He said all would see him as he returned. I can’t find any scripture that teaches anyone will be confused about who he is when he returns. Israel and the nations will see and mourn.
The confusion about who is Messiah is a current phenomena, but then everyone will know. Many shall come in my name and decieve many seems current since the left. Many anti-Christs from then until now. I think there will be no doubt of Yeshua Messiah when he comes in the clouds with tens of thousands of his saints.
“For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Wherefore comfort one another with these words.”
I don’t require that all people commenting necessarily agree with me, I just want to avoid trolls and people who personalize conflict. As blog owner, I have a responsibility to manage the commenting environment so it doesn’t turn into name calling and people sniping at one another. It’s happened plenty of times before, and I won’t contribute to it.
Anyway, why would anyone be confused about who Yeshua (Jesus) is when he returns? He must have anticipated such an occurrence, otherwise, why (as I said below) would he make a statement such as the one we find in Matthew 24:23-26? That is, why would he have to tell the apostles (and us) to not go after every rumor of the Messiah’s return?
That’s why we study the Bible and nurture our relationship with the Master, so we will recognize his voice and realize who he is upon his return. Unfortunately, there are so many Christians who have been taught to be “Church-centric” that should events happen differently than described by Evangelical Pastors, should ‘the Church’ not be whisked away into Heaven as advertised, if Messiah establishes himself on the Throne of David in Jerusalem and the Messianic Kingdom centers around Israel and not “the Church,” I think a lot of Christians are going to be confused. I think they will experience significant dissonance between what they were taught and the reality of a Jewish Messiah King.
That’s why I call myself a student of Messianic Judaism and why I try to communicate my humble insights…in the hopes of preparing the way and dispelling misinformation that replaces Israel with the Church. We need to be ready.
I hear what you are saying James, so I will not get into argument. I will limit myself to one more comment today on your blog.
I would suggest that while you communicate the hope of dispelling misinformation that replaces Israel’s physical distinction with the Church, you don’t replace the Church with physical Israel. Yeshua said “I will build my Church” and he was speaking of something that had not existed yet and was spiritual.
I’m always praying for you James. I have great hope for you. Shalom
I agree that the ekkelsia (which doesn’t directly translate as “Church” since the word “Church” wouldn’t exist for many centuries after the Bible was canonized) of Messiah was a new thing in the sense that Gentiles would join the Jewish community without having to undergo the proselyte rite and convert to Judaism, but it was hardly unanticipated, since the New Covenant language and other prophecies presuppose Gentile worship of God, including offering Temple sacrifices, and even participating in the return of Jewish exiles to Israel.
Where we may part company is that I don’t believe the ekkelsia was constructed to be totally disconnected from Israel, but rather, was the next, logical, Biblical step in Jewish devotion to God, one where Israel could fulfill its destiny to be a light to the world through its greatest light, Messiah.
I believe I described my point of view on this in the body of the blog post above, so I won’t repeat myself here, but based on the way I read the Bible, the creation of the ekklesia of Messiah wasn’t to “pull the plug” on Jewish devotion to God and force them to reattach to Him using a different religious paradigm, it was to fulfill God’s promise, by starting to bring Jews and Gentiles together in a single body so that faith in God through the good news of Messiah would spread to the rest of the world, and we could all then do God’s work in preparing our world for Messiah’s return.
Maybe I’m just naive, but why do people have problems with this? Jews can be Jews in Messiah, and Gentiles can be Gentiles. Scripture does say that salvation is to the Jew first, then the Gentile (Romans 1:16) and that we Gentiles are “grafted in” (Romans 11:17) to the Jewish tree. Soooo…yeah. Why would anyone have a problem with that? Seems pretty clear.
I think some people object because it seems to add a layer of separation between us and our relationship with God by saying the New Covenant was made with Israel and Judah (Jeremiah 31:31) and the only way a non-Jewish person can benefit from the covenant blessings is by faith in the Jewish Messiah, that is, Jesus. I’m not saying this eliminates any requirement for Jewish faith and fidelity in Messiah, but we have a “grafted in-ness” while they are the natural branches. I don’t think we are always taught in church the full meaning of those roles, Marie.
“…the New Covenant was made with Israel and Judah (Jeremiah 31:31) and the only way a non-Jewish person can benefit from the covenant blessings is by faith in the Jewish Messiah, that is, Jesus. I’m not saying this eliminates any requirement for Jewish faith and fidelity in Messiah”
Thanks for expressing this more clearly here.
You refer to gentile believers as benefitting “from the covenant blessings” rather than the gentiles entering the New Covenant. I don’t see there’s a great distinction, apart from the fact that the gentiles weren’t party to the older covenant that is being replaced; so the NEW aspect of the covenant is different to both Jew and gentile. To the Jew it is a better, updated Covenant – to the gentile it is “new” as in something not known or experienced before.
And yes, the gentile is grafted in to something he/she is not naturally a part of, and that grafting comes as a result of faith in the Jewish Messiah.
My understanding is that the Sinai Covenant (“If you obey me, I will be your God and you will be My people”) was accompanied by the conditions and terms of the covenant (what Israel was supposed to do and what God was supposed to do and the consequences for failing in obligation) which are the specific Torah commandments. Looking at the language of the New Covenant, they didn’t come with new conditions, that is, God didn’t replace the Torah with anything. What changed was the “material” the conditions were to be written on. Instead of tablets and scrolls, the conditions, God’s laws, were to be written on the heart. By infusing all humanity with His Spirit (Spirit upon all flesh), God will make it possible for not only Israel, but all humanity to obey Him without sin in the Messianic Kingdom.
The question, given everything I just said, is whether or not in Messianic days, the Gentiles will be obligated to the same Torah mitzvoth (commandments) as the Jews. Given Acts 15, I’d say not, but on the other hand, there is language in the prophets (Isaiah, for instance) that speaks of the whole world observing the Sabbath, new moon festivals, and the annual feasts, so it would seem in those days, we’ll all look a lot more “Jewish” than we do now. What makes the New Covenant better is that once God finishes writing his laws on our heart, we will naturally be predisposed to obey Him without struggling with failure.
James, in those days of Messianic rule, the world and its systems will be very different for a variety of reasons (but an absence of sin and a predisposition to obery Him is not among them. That comes later with the new earth). I started to note down some of those differences and the reasons, but decided it would need more than a brief comment on someone else’s site, and it would take more time than I have available right now, so it’s something I’ll consider doing on my own blog later.
When the true Messiah returns (after the false we’ve been warned against getting into), Steve, my understanding is, too, that it will be very clear. But there will be people who thought they were in the flock (“saved”) who were actually not and will show themselves to be too stubborn to accept how it really is. Hard to believe… but I’ve seen unbelievable stubbornness.
I “wonder” why is it that translators use the word “church” when translating the greek ἐκκλησία (ekklēsia – ek-klay-see’-ah) in the New Testament, but neglect to use the same word “church” when in the Old Testament Septuagint (LXX) for example (1 Ch 13:4), the same greek word ἐκκλησία appears as a translation for the hebrew “קהל” for congregation. In other words, the term “church” is used in the New Testament and has been “coined as a new term” by translators, when the greek word ἐκκλησία is actually used in the Old Testament as well, meaning that the term “church” is not really a new term, but an “artificial” new term.
Sorry if I have not been able to express my idea in a clearly fashion…
James, Isince positn my previous comment I’ve gone back and read your “When Jesus Returns, Will We Go To Church” article – something I must overlooked because it had been posted on the weekend (my time). I saw you dealt with a few of the same points that are in my notes regarding the world during the Messianic age.
In fact your article helped to confirm something I wanted to raise when I address it on my own blog: that there will be surviving unbelievers from among the nations entering that Messianic age.
That is something that contradicts the common belief of most Christians who assume that only believers will survive to enter “the millennium” (or according to Dispensationalists only Jews who are “converted” during the great tribulation).
For I will take you from the nations, gather you from all the lands and bring you into your own land. Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances…
‘Thus says the Lord God, “On the day that I cleanse you from all your iniquities, I will cause the cities to be inhabited, and the waste places will be rebuilt. The desolate land will be cultivated instead of being a desolation in the sight of everyone who passes by. They will say, ‘This desolate land has become like the garden of Eden; and the waste, desolate and ruined cities are fortified and inhabited.’ Then the nations that are left round about you will know that I, the Lord, have rebuilt the ruined places and planted that which was desolate; I, the Lord, have spoken and will do it.”
–Ezekiel 36:24-37, 33-36
“Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the Lord, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the Lord, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.”
For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery—so that you will not be wise in your own estimation—that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written,
“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.”
“This is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.”
From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers; for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
I just wanted to be clear that the above verses seem to indicate that at the time of returning the Jewish exiles to their Land, to the nation of Israel, at the time the Messianic Kingdom is established, is when the New Covenant blessings upon the Jewish people will be realized, all their sins will be forgiven by God, their hearts will be circumcised, a fullness of the Holy Spirit will be poured into them, and the Torah will be written on their hearts such that they will follow the statues of Hashem without sin and live in peace in their Land.
Now it will come about that
In the last days
The mountain of the house of the Lord
Will be established as the chief of the mountains,
And will be raised above the hills;
And all the nations will stream to it.
And many peoples will come and say,
“Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
To the house of the God of Jacob;
That He may teach us concerning His ways
And that we may walk in His paths.”
For the law will go forth from Zion
And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
And He will judge between the nations,
And will render decisions for many peoples;
And they will hammer their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks.
Nation will not lift up sword against nation,
And never again will they learn war.
Come, house of Jacob, and let us walk in the light of the Lord.
For thus says the Lord,
“To the eunuchs who keep My sabbaths,
And choose what pleases Me,
And hold fast My covenant,
To them I will give in My house and within My walls a memorial,
And a name better than that of sons and daughters;
I will give them an everlasting name which will not be cut off.
“Also the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord,
To minister to Him, and to love the name of the Lord,
To be His servants, every one who keeps from profaning the sabbath
And holds fast My covenant;
Even those I will bring to My holy mountain
And make them joyful in My house of prayer.
Their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be acceptable on My altar;
For My house will be called a house of prayer for all the peoples.”
The Lord God, who gathers the dispersed of Israel, declares,
“Yet others I will gather to them, to those already gathered.”
Here are the some of the relevant scriptures showing the people of the nations coming alongside Israel and joining her. My interpretation is that if we cling to the God of Israel through faith in King Messiah, then we too will have God’s Spirit poured out on all flesh (Joel 2:28) and enjoy the blessings of having our sins forgiven, having God’s Word written on our circumcised hearts, and also obey God in our walk with Him during the rule of King Messiah. We need not wait until after that period of time and until the life of the world to come.
Of course, there will be people and nations who do not accept Messiah’s reign, who do not repent and receive the forgiveness of sins, and therefore, rebellion will still exist in the world.
Considering the severity of the warfare which is to usher in that messianic kingdom, illustrated by examples such as blood flowing in Bozrah to the height of a horse’s bridle, one may well wonder how few of the originally rebellious will be among the survivors. One also might speculate that the folks in nations that are threatened with drought unless they come up to Jerusalem to celebrate Sukkot (for example) might possibly include recalcitrant former Christians who made it through the rapture but have yet to be re-educated.
Never underestimate the stubbornness of human beings, PL. I bet there will still be some folks who will be hold outs.
YEAH — what Alfredo said!
He said a little more than this, but I’m going to respond to this:
*JUNE 23, 2014 AT 10:08 PM
I “wonder” why is it that translators use the word “church” when translating the greek ἐκκλησία (ekklēsia – ek-klay-see’-ah) in the New Testament, but neglect to use the same word “church” when in the Old Testament Septuagint (LXX) for example (1 Ch 13:4), the same greek word ἐκκλησία appears as a translation for the hebrew “קהל” for congregation.*
I don’t know for sure when it started (when the church — actually something different historically from anything referred to in the Bible, while most contemporary adherents don’t know this — decided to use this kind of terminology; I could guess), but Tyndale tried to correct the nomenclature problem when he translated the NT for King James. The King, after executing (by strangulation) him, ordered subsequent translators to keep the word church (political and power reasons with him as England’s head). However, at about that time, there was a move to start using Greek and Hebrew manuscripts for the newer and older portions (instead, I suppose, of the traditional Latin translation from Catholicism) to make printing press versions in various languages. While Tyndale was bright enough to see what you’ve shared about the the Hebrew and Greek (although I’m not sure he had a copy of the Septuagint), translators since either don’t notice or don’t care, or maybe just look in English “Bible dictionaries” (with the bias built in) for their answers.
I’ve looked for Bibles translated to English from the Septuagint and the Greek NT manuscripts (in one volume). It basically hasn’t been done (as far as I could tell) — until a few years ago.
Here’s something I didn’t know until today (Wikipedia):
*Tyndale had to learn Hebrew in Germany due to England’s active Edict of Expulsion against the Jews. He worked in an age where Greek was available to the European scholarly community for the first time in centuries.*
CORRECTION! I should have been referring to King Henry VIII — and, to clarify, “for” the king doesn’t mean the king commissioned the efforts. William Tyndale was inspired and self-motivated.