choose life

How To Build A Better Life

Writes Rabbi Twerski: the sum total of all the traits that are unique to human beings comprise the spirit that makes us distinctly human. Whether one believes that the spirit was instilled in man by God or somehow developed in the process of human evolution — the fact that human beings have a spirit is independent of one’s belief.

If one is seeking spirituality, then one must exercise his uniquely human capacities. Spirituality is thus nothing more than the implementation of these capacities, hence spirituality can be seen as being synonymous with humanity. To the degree that a person is lacking in spirituality, to that degree he is lacking in humanity.

Without including religion in the definition of spirituality, the above definition is for generic spirituality. However, for Jewish spirituality one needs to look to the Torah for direction on how a Jew should exercise his uniquely human capacities!

-Rabbi Kalman Packouz citing
Rabbi Abraham Twerski’s book Twerski on Spirituality
in this week’s “Shabbat Shalom Weekly”

Which begs the question of what Rabbi Packouz or Rabbi Twerski would believe a non-Jew’s proper expression of spirituality should be. Probably as a Noahide, but I’ve covered that territory before.

Taking a step back, what makes human beings unique and spiritual beings? From R. Twerski’s book, Rabbi Packouz lists eight attributes:

  1. The ability to learn from past history.
  2. The capacity to think about the goal and purpose of one’s existence.
  3. The capacity to volitionally improve oneself.
  4. The capacity to delay gratification.
  5. The capacity to reflect on the consequence of his actions.
  6. The capacity to control anger.
  7. The capacity to forgive.
  8. Free will.
Rabbi Kalman Packouz
Rabbi Kalman Packouz

Granted, that people possess these abilities doesn’t mean they exercise them all the time (and some people exercise them almost none of the time, or so it seems), but we do possess them and they are at our disposal.

Please click the link to R. Packouz’s article that I inserted above to read the definitions for each of the numbered items. I’ll quote from the last one here: Free Will.

Animals are under the absolute domination of their body and cannot make a free choice. If hungry, it must look for food. It can’t decide to fast today. If a jackal sees a tiger eating a carcass, it will refrain for fear of retribution. Only a human being can be in a position with no possibility of detection or retribution and decide not to steal because it is morally and ethically wrong.

To the best of my understanding, only a human being can contemplate God and his/her relationship to Him. Only a human being can deliberately ignore God or dismiss Him as “unreal”.

However, since God gave us these capacities, we are responsible for putting them into play and in how we choose to use each of them.

That means we are responsible for not only learning from our past mistakes, but the past mistakes of our ancestors; history’s past mistakes.

Thus a world of human beings should have learned from thousands of years of anti-Semitism and Jew-hatred, but that doesn’t seem to be taking place. The Church as a unified entity (understanding that there are actually thousands upon thousands of separate denominations) should have learned that the Jewish people and Israel have not been rendered obsolete because of “Jesus,” but that doesn’t appear to be happening either. So far, humanity has done a rather poor job of learning from history, in spite of the fact that so-called “progressives” believe they are “on the right side of history” (but are they on the “right side of God?”).

I mentioned a little earlier that only human beings are able to contemplate God. Item two seems related to this since our goal and the purpose of our existence cannot be separated from God’s reason for creating each of us. And yet, how many times have you asked yourself why God specifically created you and why you are here in the first place? I’ve asked myself that question many times. I still do.

I heard a bit of dialogue in an otherwise unremarkable movie once that’s stuck with me:

Her: “People change.”

Him: “Most people don’t.”

Once we’ve locked on to a goal or goals for ourselves, we can create a plan for personal improvement and enact that plan.

Yeah, right.

OK, maybe that’s unfair, but most people, including me, get to a certain point in our personal development and then tend to stay there. Depending on what stage the person is stalled or stuck at, they can be adequate and even accomplished human beings, or they can be desperately flawed and dysfunctional.

FallingSome people make many plans and goals but fall flat at the execution stage. Others become too anxious to even imagine a plan to change and perform the metaphorical act of “hiding under the bed,” as if life will just leave them alone if they ignore it.

Fasting on Yom Kippur (or for other reasons) teaches delaying gratification. Actually, anyone who’s ever been a parent or grandparent knows all about delaying gratification.

My wife and I had our grandkids for the weekend. Actually, our son brought them over for dinner last Thursday and Friday evening as well, so we saw a great deal of them all. My grandson is seven years old, and my granddaughter is 9 months. They have radically different needs and meeting the needs of both simultaneously isn’t always easy.

Since babies need more attention than little boys, my grandson sometimes had to delay gratification. When I was alone watching both kids and I needed for feed my granddaughter, my grandson had to find something else to do besides play with Grandpa (don’t worry…we found plenty of opportunities to have adventures).

It goes without saying that my wife and I, as well as the kids’ Dad, Uncle, and Auntie, all delayed gratification to one degree or another when the children were in our home. That’s what adults do, especially when taking care of kids. That’s what you do when you love someone and you put their needs and wants ahead of your own.

Ideally, it’s what you do when you love God and you recognize what He wants you to do and what His priorities for you are. It’s not like God is a dictator or doesn’t want you to have time to relax or have fun, but as His servants and His children, we have a responsibility to Him first and foremost. If we see someone else in our world who has a need, God has given us the ability to attend to that need first because, after all, it’s the right thing to do.

Not that we actually do so all the time.

Consequences, like Karma, are a b**** (you probably know how to finish that quote). They are also a reality of life. For instance, if you choose not to pay a debt, your wages or taxes can be garnished. I think this goes along with delaying gratification.

Unless you are insanely wealthy, you have only so much money each month to work with. That means, if you are at all responsible, you have a budget. You may “flex” it a little bit with a credit card, but when all the bills come in, they need to be paid.

That means choosing to pay for necessities first, such as food, housing, clothing, and so forth, and only afterward using money to “play”. Reversing that process tends to lead to painful consequences.

no evil

There are also consequences for “blowing off” God. They most likely aren’t immediate. We know that will be an accounting, a judgment at the end of all things, so it may seem as if God is giving you a pass with what ever sin(s) you have a problem with.

Sure, God can arrange for natural consequences. If you use drugs or alcohol habitually, all God has to do is wait for your body to start falling apart. Same for overeating (which is a big problem in our nation). Same for a lot of things. The consequences are built into many sins. For some though, you just have to stand by. Don’t worry. They’ll come. Or you can learn from your mistakes and improve your life so you stop sinning and thus avoid uncomfortable consequences.

Your choice (free will, remember?).

Every time I drive anymore, I get a lesson in controlling my anger. I’m not always successful. It seems that as I get older, I don’t have as great a capacity to tolerate traffic. Good thing I live near Boise, Idaho now rather than Orange County, California.

But going back to the example of being a parent or grandparent for a moment, let’s take another look at controlling anger. Sometimes adults get angry at kids, at least momentarily. You catch a kid coloring on the freshly painted walls of her bedroom or letting the air out of your car’s tires (I did the latter once when I was five). Your immediate tendency is to explode at them (Don’t worry, my Dad didn’t).

If you are a mature adult, you stop yourself. Really, they’re just kids. They do stuff like that. Yeah, you can create consequences for their behavior so they can learn more about right and wrong, but blowing up at a kid is just satisfying your own impulses rather than displaying good parenthood.

The same is true when you get angry at another adult in the presence of your kids. Parents fight sometimes. Some fights are louder than others. While yelling and screaming at a significant other doesn’t do you or them any good (how many people have changed for the better as a result of being screamed at?), if kids are around, it’s not only uncomfortable, it’s terrifying.

When Mom and Dad have a major emotional eruption at each other, it’s like the kid’s world has fallen apart. The two people in life who a child absolutely must depend upon and believe in have just exploded into a temper tantrum that makes Mount St Helens look like a firecracker, and that means the two people who are supposed to provide for the physical and emotional security of their child have completely failed and gone down in flames, pulling their child in with them.

divorceOK, I get it. People argue sometimes. Fine. We’re all human, in good ways and bad. But don’t do it when your children are around. That’s not being a good parent, adult, or human being.

The flip side is the capacity to forgive. But wait.

I think Rabbi Packouz (and maybe Rabbi Twerski) missed something. It’s not just about putting our own hurts aside and forgiving the person who hurt us. How about the ability to say you’re sorry, mean it, and ask for forgiveness when you’re the one who’s “blown it?”

If you indeed have blown up at someone or otherwise have failed to maintain behavior consistent with being a mature adult, after you’ve calmed down and realized the consequences of your actions, you have the option of apologizing and asking forgiveness.

Bernie Sanders recently accused the IDF of killing 10,000 innocents in an operation responding to terrorist acts initiated in Gaza. He admitted in the radio interview that he wasn’t sure of his statistics, then went ahead and uttered his outrageous statements anyway.

When later confronted with the fact that the figure was more like 2,300 “Palestinian” Arabs, and many of them were combatants, not innocent bystanders, instead of Bernie apologizing, he said that the New York Daily News distorted his statement.

I heard the radio interview and nothing was distorted or misrepresented except Sanders’ so-called “facts”. Bernie could have taken the moral high road and admitted his mistake (it’s pretty easy to make one when you don’t have accurate information immediately at hand), but instead, he chose to (in my opinion) lie about it, avoid personal responsibility, and blame others for his own inadequacies.

While R. Packouz citing R. Twerski’s list of items of what it is to be human seems pretty optimistic, it’s all too apparent that being human has some serious drawbacks. We have all of these wonderful abilities, and a lot of the time, we don’t use them or don’t use them very well.

Which brings us back to free will.

We can recognize that we are flawed, imperfect, and sometimes even damaged and dysfunctional human beings who have these terrific capacities and screw up using them more often than not.

screw it

We can recognize all that and say “screw it.” We can give up. Someone recently wrote about this on her blog. Her choice was go not give up and not give in, but to stay the course.

Moved by her struggle, I offered this:

Affirmations are powerful. They work for us or against us. Every statement we tell ourselves about who we are and what we find possible is really an affirmation. Positive affirmations build us. Negative affirmations do the opposite. So right now you can tell yourself a great affirmation: “I choose better, higher, and wiser self-talk each and every day.”

-Rabbi Zelig Pliskin

The trick about positive affirmations, is that they need to be used as motivators for actual change, not just internet “memes” that sound good, but only serve to create the illusion that you already are the person you want and need to be.

Using the positive affirmation that you are courageous means that you have to follow-up by facing some difficult situation with courage, rather than avoiding it. Using the positive affirmation that you are compassionate means that you have to follow-up by showing compassion to another person, even if they aren’t very easy to get along with. Using the positive affirmation that you are productive and self-supporting means…

…well, you get the idea.

Bernie Sanders is a politician, so I expect him to lie, even to himself. However Bernie Sanders, like the rest of us, is a human being, and thus, he is ultimately responsible for using what God gave him or to face the consequences…in this life or the next.

Since he’s Jewish, as the quote I placed at the top of today’s “meditation” attests, he’s responsible for looking “to the Torah for direction on how a Jew should exercise his uniquely human capacities!”

As far as I can tell, he’s got a long way to go.

But so do the rest of us.

Where do we look (assuming non-Jews) for direction on how we should exercise our uniquely human capacities? If you are a normative Christian, you’ll probably say “the Bible” and really means your particular church’s interpretation of scripture.

If you’re someone like me, the answer is essentially the same, but the interpretation is different, sometimes really different.

I recently read a question in a closed Facebook group asked by a non-Jew who was wondering what sources he could consult to determine if we, like the Jewish people, are obligated or at least allowed to participate in specific times and practices of prayer. There was a brief but lively discussion, and the general consensus was that while we may not be obligated, we are most likely allowed to pray in a manner similar to Jewish praxis, adjusting for a non-Jewish and non-covenant relationship with God.

And all this takes us back to the question I implied at the top of today’s blog post: What is a non-Jew’s proper expression of spirituality given a more “Judaic” understanding of the meaning and purpose of the Bible, the Messiah, and Jewish Israel?

loveThat answer is our ongoing struggle for self-definition and, for some of you at least, your role and purpose within Jewish community. For the rest of us, it’s merely working out who we are to God and to other human beings, community notwithstanding. At the end of the day, regardless of who we are, who is in our lives, and what we believe, it’s just us and God.

What we do matters. Each day is an opportunity to do just a little bit better than you did the day before. With each morning’s dawn you can dedicate yourself to having a good day. With each passing day, you are building a life. Let’s all try to build a good one.

Individual commitment to a group effort — that is what makes a team work, a company work, a society work, a civilization work.

-Vince Lombardi

14 thoughts on “How To Build A Better Life”

  1. The very best affirmation I have ever found is in the Scriptures…the 23rd Psalm, written by David.

    I prefer the following version, for it’s beauty of phrasing:

    YHVH is my shepherd; I shall not want. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: He leadeth me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul: He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.

    “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for Thou art with me; Thy rod and Thy staff they comfort me. Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: Thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.”

    Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of YHVH for ever.

  2. I pray that he find a good group of sources of facts on the subject of conflicts in Israel, and/or locks in on them (paying close attention). I also hope that he (Sanders himself) will make a correction above what the campaign representative said. He should be better (is better but needs to be far better… and is, but still) than Clinton, who has recently said most gun crime in New York is committed with guns from Vermont — which is patently false. She said it although the governor of Vermont has been supporting her. (Maybe he will rethink that.)

  3. @Cynthia: Thanks.

    @Questor: True.

    @Marleen: Sanders isn’t particularly interested in the facts. He’s speaking to a particular demographic in our nation that has been fed the narrative that Israel is evil, “Palestine” is good, and Arab terrorism against Israeli Jews (and by extension, against Jews worldwide) is justified.

  4. I guess you’re saying I shouldn’t pray for him. I think I will anyway. As for wanting to believe certain things, I wonder… I did think of that (and what a motivation could be). That would be sad, of course. It seems to me one has to go out if his way in the United States to find “news” like that. I could be wrong about it, and maybe somehow he’s got a source coming right to him* that is tilted differently. I mean, seriously, I (among other news sources) watch MSNBC, and they are pro-Israel in the sense at least of being neutral (not in any sense of hyping things up), and I’d say more than neutral (because of “western” tendencies). [Note, there is no need to hype things up if the facts are in your favor.]

    He hasn’t said anything outright anti-Israel that I’ve seen. [I do know some people think any nod to a “two-state solution” is anti-Israel. But if that’s the case, no one escapes the charge, not even Netanyahu. Okay, “no one” isn’t precisely correct. My point is hopefully obvious, that it’s inconsistent to hold that against people.] I haven’t heard him say a lot about Israel. If he has given some revelatory speech or official statement, let me know. I haven’t even heard him utter the phrase “two-state solution” (not saying he hasn’t said it), have heard him state clearly Israel’s right to exist and defend herself robustly. I think it’s fair to gather information before accusing enthusiastically.

    * In other words, that he isn’t going out of his way.

  5. From The Forward (which I’ve not read until someone referenced it at MyMorningMeditations): …Sanders’ interview with the New York Daily News, when he mistakenly said that 10,000 innocent people were killed in Gaza by Israel during Operation Protective Edge. … a day before the rally in Brooklyn the Sanders campaign published an announcement that the senator was referring to the number of injured and not the number of dead.

    That does make sense. I saw him state in an official town hall or debate that Trump says wages are “too low” — when he meant to say Trump says wages are “too high” (that ordinary people are being paid too much). He didn’t catch himself at all and notice he’d said it wrong. [Obviously, he’d want to say it right (as before).]

    From Leadercall, which has some sloppy and misleading writing in my estimation from the looks of it (and who say some strange things that count on not knowing how things are really going, like wrongly saying Hillary Clinton took the high road against Sanders), clearly relishing being against Sanders [and I’m not sure who all, as they ended with a statement (with no clear attribution) that (Hillary Clinton) saying combative Palestinians are often dressed as civilians is libelous]:

    …he was immediately corrected by his interviewer when he made the remark- a correction he swiftly accepted.

    During an interview with the editorial board of the New York Daily News, Sanders was asked about the fighting in 2014 and what Israel could have done differently to reduce casualties.

    I’m quoting that, above, as it gives context. I can’t vouch for the article, though. (And today is my first day reading there at all.)

    There’s a supposed link in the article to a “Morning Joe” interview. But it doesn’t go to any such interview. Instead, it goes to the same interview a link for something else goes to (at this time).

    Here’s the ending: “Hamas provokes Israel. They often pretend to have people in civilian garb acting as though they are civilians who are Hamas fighters”, Clinton told CNN’s “State of the Union” talk show on Sunday, according to Politico. “That claim is just as libelous as the claim that Israel killed 10,000 innocent civilians”. But you can not ignore the needs of the Palestinian people.

    Me: Reporting in The States, showed that attacks were coming from within “civilian” areas. The instigators endanger their people.

  6. By the way, I watch FOX too. I learned recently that a lot of old white men think black people can’t get jobs because of tattoos on black people’s faces (like this is the trouble).Enlightening.

    I have to say, Trump didn’t act like he agreed at all. Maybe the two of them planned this to make Trump look better than lately; it wouldn’t be a sacrifice for O’Reilly, who only cares about ratings.

  7. So… the article I said was not written well in general also presented a characterization of a correction incorrectly (in my estimation). The interviewer interjected immediately but wasn’t sure or clear. Bernie didn’t disagree, though, that the number was lower (which within himself surely could have been an immediate or swift, even pre-existing, sense that he believed the paper to have the right count). And the following seems to be the crux of the point. This is sort of half of a response, the other half pointing out that Israel is a different country that the President of the United States doesn’t run, nor would he run their military:

    …Look, we are living, for better or worse, in a world of high technology, whether it’s drones out there that could, you know, take your nose off, and Israel has that technology. And I think there is a general belief that, with that technology, they could have been more discriminate in terms of taking out weapons that were threatening them.

    Daily News: Do you support the Palestinian leadership’s attempt to use the International Criminal Court to litigate some of these issues to establish that, in their view, Israel had committed essentially war crimes?

    Sanders: No.

    Daily News: Why not?

    Sanders: Why not?

    To me, he was speaking like an Israeli who has the right and the sense of connection to speak. Maybe some people think he should speak more like American Christian would-be leaders who would rather warm up to blowing up the world, at least the outside world.

    When the interviewer, later, when the conversation was on to another topic (somewhat similar but with regard to the United States), firmed up the statistics/words (backtracking out of context), he again didn’t argue (and, as I indicated, may not have realized what the interviewer said then was different from what they’d said earlier).

  8. What I just posted, above, is from the transcript of the interview. (Sorry I forgot to definitively say that.)

    Below, this is from the poorly written article I noted:

    The Vermont senator… asserted that Israel killed about 10,000 innocent Palestinians in the conflict…

    He used that number and asked.

    Donald J. Trump, real estate tycoon and the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination, incurred widespread criticism from both Republicans and Democrats for stating he would be “sort of neutral” as president between Israel and the Palestinians. …

    But Sanders doubled down on his statement…

    He absolutely didn’t double down.

    Convenient that the (poorly-written) article doesn’t mention there were 10,000 hurt. When I read an article James linked to, I could see the problem right away. There is a 10,000 involved.

  9. Daily News: And I’m going to look at 2014, which was the latest conflict. What should Israel have done instead?

    Sanders: You’re asking me now to make not only decisions for the Israeli government but for the Israeli military, and I don’t quite think I’m qualified to make decisions.

    …and I do know that the Palestinians, some of them, were using civilian areas to launch missiles. Makes it very difficult.

  10. Sanders: I assume that’s something…

    Daily News: And where you start on the negotiations is important.


    Daily News: Okay… ….That’s going to be the baseline. Now, if you’re really…

    Sanders: Well, there’s going to be a lot of things on the baselines. There are going to be demands being made of the Palestinian folks as well. When you sit down and negotiate, obviously…

    Daily News: And what are those demands?

    Sanders: Well, for a start, the absolute condemnation of all terrorist attacks. The idea that in Gaza there were buildings being used to construct missiles and bombs and tunnels, that is not where foreign aid should go. Foreign aid should go to housing and schools, not the development of bombs and missiles.

    Daily News: Okay. Now, you have obviously condemned Hamas for indiscriminate rocket attacks and the construction of the military tunnels. …..

    So, where was that in the debate tonight?

  11. Marlene,

    It looks like you have a gift to be able to talk politics. A man at work tries to get me to talk politics sometimes and I can barely think of anything to say.

    Have a good Shabbat! : )

    Jill Harris

  12. Thank you, Jill. I also consider it being a witness.

    There was a lot in the opening “meditation” —
    and I’ll say I agree with James’ parenting…
    and, apparently, that of his dad as well.

    [Note: That “debate” was on CNN.]

  13. Marleen said:

    I guess you’re saying I shouldn’t pray for him. I think I will anyway.

    Actually, that wasn’t my intent. As I understand it, we are supposed to pray for our leaders and our government, so it’s a mitzvah to pray for Sanders.

    As far as Sanders’ source about the number of people killed in Gaza is concerned, we can only speculate. It’s possible Bernie may not recall specifically where he heard his news. It’s pretty common for us to hear something, recall it incorrectly, and thus recite some piece of information as fact rather than faulty recall. In this case, I’m giving Sanders the benefit of the doubt, but I also know that politicians will deliberately present information to mislead his/her constituents or say something he/she knows they want to hear. You never know.

    About another comment you made, I think it’s interesting that Clinton is uttering pro-Israel rhetoric when historically she’s been anti-Israel. My guess is that she’ll take every opportunity to appear differently than Bernie and, if possible, to make him look bad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.